Re-Posted: Are The White Hats Setting The Precedence Where Globalists & Other Enemies Foreign & Domestic Can Be Tried Under Military Tribunal & Courts – Martial?

Are The White Hats Setting The Precedence Where Globalists & Other Enemies Foreign & Domestic Can Be Tried Under Military Tribunal & Courts – Martial?:  Originally posted 3 months ago

-by mtnforge

You can read it for yourself and determine what Executive/Commander In Chief 2018 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States signifies. Pay close attention to the last paragraph, as it alludes to a significant and unprecedented change in the relation between Domestic Rule of Constitutional Law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It certainly has within the legitimacy of providing lawful grounds for the US military under guidance & assistance of the Departments of Homeland Security and Department of Justice to pursue indict arrest prosecute and sentence foreign and national non military, non government, corporate, and political actors & entities, i.e. enemies foreign & domestic, under United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Courts – Martial.

Note also its inception date, and the qualifying description of its relative merits to existing UCMJ both existing and future.

If the rumors are true of increase of prison cells and related infrastructures at US Military Guantanamo Bay are true, it would appear a series of preparations are being implemented to process an highly unusual number of economic and political criminals waging economic and cultural warfare against the people of the United State of America.

Also of seemingly related actions are the reported quantity of thousands of sealed secret indictments by secret grand juries, the recent opening of a number of secret indictments have been executed by special military actions in various international locations with the arrest of various criminal corruption, economic terrorists and human trafficking individuals.

The recent Saudi actions of arresting and prosecution of Saudi corruptocrats, and resulting dismantling of their terrorist interests and activities appear to nave time and association linkage to the above international activities.

Q and the Anons have have revealed and exposed a litany of related activities directly associated within the sphere of interest pertaining to all the above.

It is interesting to note a myriad of related activities related to domestic investigation into both domestic & foreign actors and exposed findings within the sphere of obama/clinton regime weaponized FBI, DOJ, CIA, BLM, T&S Commission, State Department and NSA, are seemingly related and exposed daily as complicit in treasonous conspiracies of globalist/1 world order corporate entities agenda’s of world domination of water, food, energy, commodities, raw materials, money, & securities, with the manipulation and monopoly of control of the economic and political infrastructure of a syndicate of trans nationalist organized crime and abuse of power both within and without the sovereign United States of America. (Corroborating links to be added shortly)

The civilian guidance clauses create a scope of co-operation which points to the intent of prosecuting foreign actors and entities free from the checks & balances of Constitutional Law and its intent of the concept of rule of law, which has up to know remained as a terribly abused tactic of committing high crimes, terrorism, (economic and physical), and treason, violating all ideas of Rule of Law, then running behind said Rule of Laws protections only sovereign citizens of the USofA are blessed with to protect themselves.

Action which we witnessed with the early obama regimes, Clinton State Department, and DOJ of handling the issues of purview/prosecution of international terrorists, of their status classified as foreign nationals/foreign enemies or as coming under the protections of Habeas Corpus.

Regardless this is a serious change and foretells of emanate action unlike anything seen before.

Related sources of information & interest, (there is not much right now which is unrelated isolated & spontaneous):

The Myth of Global Markets Explains Why The DC UniParty View POTUS Trump As a Risk To Their World Order…

Unhappy Canada Vows Retaliation For Steel Tariffs – NAFTA, Steel, Tariffs and An Introduction To Liu Zhongtian…

Viscerally Visceral, by Robert Gore

Six Points by GoneWithTheWind

How the Left Runs Psyops On Allied and Enemy Americans

More cover-up questions The curious murder of Seth Rich poses questions that just won’t stay under the official rug

Unrolled thread from @prayingmedic #Qanon #GreatAwakening Tip of the iceberg. To understand everything you first have to understand how to recognize bread crumbs, and their inherent insights into unknown unknowns & Q/anons.

David Hines: How the Left Runs Psyops On Allied and Enemy Americans He further elaborates the basics of the plan being executed in Operation Parkland. -Ace of Spades:

“…Further tweets below are taken out of tweet format and just printed as normal text, in blockquotes. But they come from David Hines (@hradzka on Twitter).

The way spectrum of allies analysis works is: you categorize people and groups by where they stand in relation to you and your target on whatever issue you’re working on.

Active opponents are against you, and fighting you.
Passive opponents are against you, but they’re not fighting you.
Neutrals are neither against or for you.
Passive allies are with you, but they’re not fighting for you.
Active allies are with you and are fighting for you.


The point of spectrum of allies analysis is figuring out who you can move one notch. Who can you move toward you? Who can you move away from your enemy? And how do you make sure you don’t push people away from you?

Active allies: engage them.
Passive allies: make them active.
Neutrals: inform or educate them to make them passive allies.
Passive opponents: make them move to neutral by worrying their position may cost them — BUT CAREFULLY, so they don’t become active opponents.

Active opponents: make it clear that anything they do against you will cost them, so they retreat to being passive opponents. Failing that, isolate them.

You are now thinking, “Holy crap, yeah, I’ve seen this technique used everywhere.”

So under this system, companies giving the NRA discounts are passive opponents to gun control activists. Get them to drop this discount. Make them neutral. And it’s not like NRA members really *use* discounts much, so the companies will see no strong material argument against.


But if this works: look, now you’ve got precedent.

(Turns out it cost Delta a $40 million tax break. But most companies with NRA discounts are not vulnerable like that, in large part bc *the NRA does not have comparable research to know what their weaknesses to pressure are.*)

Activists have been researching firearms companies, finding ones vulnerable to pressure or whose parent companies are. That’s where the REI thing comes in. This has not been done in a few weeks. It is careful preparation and it takes months. Groundwork was done months ago.

That’s how this stuff is done: preparation, preparation, PREPARATION, then carefully staged release, usually on a calendar, but in this case probably at the most favorable moment that presented itself.

What you’re seeing is activist pressure to turn NRA’s passive allies neutral.

The Lyft thing? Free rides to the march? Lyft didn’t just decide to do that. They were asked, and asked carefully, and the people asking knew the people they asked were passive allies needing a push.

It pays to be familiar with activists’ analytical tools (this isn’t the only one, of course). Turn them against yourself or your organization; that way, if you’re subject of an activist attack, you’ll get an idea of where the attack is likely to come from. Don’t get caught blind.

/fin

oh, and a PS. If all this stuff sounds military to you? *That’s because it is.* Don’t think of activism as bullshit the other guys do. Think of it as a non-violent army. That’s what it is. And it’s hard work. Respect it.
I would say the most egregious part of this warplan, and the one that makes me the most animated, is the part where they attempt to pressurize their “active enemies” into a coerced silence, threatening consequences for speaking out against them.

I would further say the biggest division on what used to be called “The Right” are the two main factions’ understanding of this tactic and this desired end-state, and their total rejection of it — or soft toleration of it.

Some of us are still in Business as Usual Mode and some of us are highly alarmed at how close the left is to achieving its end-state of a society divided between the Empowered True Believers and the Denigrated and Threatened Underclass, and are no longer willing to walk towards the gulags.

As we consider civil equality and freedom-in-fact (not just theoretical freedom, but actual real freedom in the real world) to be principles that are more important than any other, we are willing to violate some of the less-important procedural principles to fight the left’s objective of complete subjugation of us.

To many of us, it appears the Business As Usual crowd is focused on fairly trivial procedural matters while performing their appointed duties as the left’s enablers and enforcers of complete social and cultural rulership by the left.”

*

More links to be added shortly…

why-they-fear-donald-trump
There are White Hats. They know just how far the Rabbit Hole goes.

The problem is endemic. Its tentacles reach into every facet of our sphere of activity. Many are so inured, so brainwashed, they are unready to be unplugged. They are unready to accept the truth but in tiny breadcrumbs. Some will do anything to resist changing their world view, as Lenin’s useful dupes, and an army of sychopants/apparatchiks, the body of the collective hive mind, to do their masters bidding of dirty work rather than face their fears with courage and moral turpitude.

Those red pilled do not suffer such cognitive dissonance and dissimulation. Those taking the blue pill, who plausible deniability has replaced reason, logic and critical thinking skills, wake up in bed and believe whatever to justify their illusions.

Its always time to re-watch The Matrix. As the Lady said, The answers are out there Neo, and they will find you if you let them.

As they say, RTWT:

(copy & pasted in entirety, verbatim from the above link)

***

EXECUTIVE ORDERS

2018 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States

LAW & JUSTICE

Issued on: March 1, 2018

ALL NEWS

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473 of April 13, 1984, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Part II, Part III, and Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, are amended as described in Annex 1, which is attached to and made a part of this order.

Sec. 2. The amendments in Annex 1 shall take effect on the date of this order, subject to the following:

(a) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the date of this order that was not punishable when done or omitted.

(b) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to invalidate the prosecution of any offense committed before the date of this order. The maximum punishment for an offense committed before the date of this order shall not exceed the maximum punishment in effect at the time of the commission of such offense.

(c) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to the date of this order, and any such nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action shall proceed in the same manner and with the same effect as if the amendments in Annex 1 had not been prescribed.

Sec. 3. (a) Pursuant to section 5542 of the Military

Justice Act of 2016 (MJA), division E of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, Public Law 114-328, 130 Stat. 2000, 2967 (2016), except as otherwise provided by the MJA or this order, the MJA shall take effect on January 1, 2019.

(b) Nothing in the MJA shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to January 1, 2019, that was not punishable when done or omitted.

(c) Nothing in title LX of the MJA shall be construed to invalidate the prosecution of any offense committed before January 1, 2019. The maximum punishment for an offense committed before January 1, 2019, shall not exceed the maximum punishment in effect at the time of the commission of such offense.

(d) Nothing in the MJA shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to January 1, 2019. Except as otherwise provided in this order, the MJA shall not apply in any case in which charges are referred to trial by court-martial before January 1, 2019. Except as otherwise provided in this order, proceedings in any such case shall be held in the same manner and with the same effect as if the MJA had not been enacted.

Sec. 4. The Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, as amended by section 1 of this order, is amended as described in Annex 2, which is attached to and made a part of this order.

Sec. 5. The amendments in Annex 2, including Appendix 12A, shall take effect on January 1, 2019, subject to the following:

(a) Nothing in Annex 2 shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to January 1, 2019, that was not punishable when done or omitted.

(b) Nothing in section 4 of Annex 2 shall be construed to invalidate the prosecution of any offense committed before January 1, 2019. The maximum punishment for an offense committed before January 1, 2019, shall not exceed the maximum punishment in effect at the time of the commission of such offense.

(c) Nothing in Annex 2 shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to January 1, 2019. Except as otherwise provided in this order, the amendments in Annex 2 shall not apply in any case in which charges are referred to trial by court-martial before January 1, 2019. Except as otherwise provided in this order, proceedings in any such case shall be held in the same manner and with the same effect as if such amendments had not been prescribed.

Sec. 6. (a) The amendments to Articles 2, 56(d), 58a, and 63 of the UCMJ enacted by sections 5102, 5301, 5303, and 5327 of the MJA apply only to cases in which all specifications allege offenses committed on or after January 1, 2019.

(b) If the accused is found guilty of a specification alleging the commission of one or more offenses before January 1, 2019, Article 60 of the UCMJ, as in effect on the date of the earliest offense of which the accused was found guilty, shall apply to the convening authority, in addition to the suspending authority in Article 60a(c) as enacted by the MJA, to the extent that Article 60:

(1) requires action by the convening authority on the sentence;

(2) permits action by the convening authority on findings;

(3) authorizes the convening authority to modify the findings and sentence of a court-martial, dismiss any charge or specification by setting aside a finding of guilty thereto, or change a finding of guilty to a charge or specification to a finding of guilty to an offense that is a lesser included offense of the offense stated in the charge or specification;

(4) authorizes the convening authority to order a proceeding in revision or a rehearing; or

(5) authorizes the convening authority to approve, disapprove, commute, or suspend a sentence in whole or in part.

Sec. 7. The amendment to Article 15 of the UCMJ enacted by section 5141 of the MJA shall apply to any nonjudicial punishment imposed on or after January 1, 2019.

Sec. 8. The amendments to Articles 32 and 34 of the UCM enacted by sections 5203 and 5205 of the MJA apply with respect to preliminary hearings conducted and advice given on or after January 1, 2019.

Sec. 9. The amendments to Article 79 of the UCMJ enacted by section 5402 of the MJA and the amendments to Appendix 12A to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, made by this order apply only to offenses committed on or after January 1, 2019.

Sec. 10. Except as provided by Rule for Courts-Martial 902A, as promulgated by Annex 2, any change to sentencing procedures:

(a) made by Articles 16(c)(2), 19(b), 25(d)(2) and (3), 39(a)(4), 53, 53a, or 56(c) of the UCMJ, as enacted by sections 5161, 5163, 5182, 5222, 5236, 5237, and 5301 of the MJA; or

(b) included in Annex 2 in rules implementing those articles, applies only to cases in which all specifications allege offenses committed on or after January 1, 2019.

Sec. 11. The amendments to Article 146 of the UCMJ enacted by section 5521 of the MJA and the new Article 146a enacted by section 5522 of the MJA shall take effect on the day after the report for fiscal year 2017 required by Article 146(c) of the UCMJ (as in effect before the MJA’s amendments) is submitted in accordance with Article 146(c)(1), but in no event later than December 1, 2018.

Sec. 12. In accordance with Article 33 of the UCMJ, as amended by section 5204 of the MJA, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, will issue nonbinding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to the disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under Articles 30 and 34 of the UCMJ. That guidance will take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Federal Government with respect to the disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

March 1, 2018.

Categories: All The Posts
Leave a Comment
Dirt People

Back to top

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s